<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-07-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2319" />
  <endPage num="2384" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nyrstar</name>
      <text id="201207100a3fe9d355624927b0000469">
        <heading>NYRSTAR</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3533" kind="question">
        <name>Mr BROCK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Frome</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-07-10">
            <name>NYRSTAR</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-07-10T14:18:00" />
        <text id="201207100a3fe9d355624927b0000470">
          <timeStamp time="2012-07-10T14:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3533">Mr BROCK (Frome) (14:18):</by>  I have a supplementary, Madam Speaker, and this is to the minister for the environment. The press release in <term>The Australian</term> this morning says that the company also faces new licence conditions from the state Environment Protection Authority, expected to cost $500 million. Can the minister make any comment on that?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201207100a3fe9d355624927b0000471">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Member for Frome, that was actually another question, but I will give you that out of graciousness.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water and the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-07-10T14:18:00" />
        <page num="2351" />
        <text id="201207100a3fe9d355624927b0000472">
          <timeStamp time="2012-07-10T14:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (14:18):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. It is common knowledge within this chamber that variations were made to the licence conditions. Those variations have been agreed to by Nyrstar and, of course, those variations are, as my colleague said, about ensuring that the environmental footprint, and indeed the lead emissions, are and continue to be significantly reduced through this particular process.</text>
        <text id="201207100a3fe9d355624927b0000473">With respect to the $500 million, I am not quite sure where that has been plucked from, but what I would say is that the commitment made by Nyrstar with respect to the agreement of the variations and conditions, as was mentioned by my colleague, will necessitate investment in infrastructure to achieve those variations. With respect to the figure, I can't comment on that because I don't know. All I do know, as this house knows, is that matters of enforcement, compliance and licence conditions are matters for the EPA. However those variations were agreed to between the EPA and Nyrstar.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>