<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-06-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2217" />
  <endPage num="2282" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hospital Parking</name>
      <text id="20120626ff0492f6a6ee421490000305">
        <heading>HOSPITAL PARKING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-06-26">
            <name>HOSPITAL PARKING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-06-26T16:14:00" />
        <text id="20120626ff0492f6a6ee421490000306">
          <timeStamp time="2012-06-26T16:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (16:14):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health and Ageing. Will the commercialisation of hospital car parks and their transfer to private ownership have any unintended consequences for businesses in respect of fringe benefits tax? If so, has the government consulted with businesses that may be affected? The government has acknowledged cabinet plans to privatise hospital car parks. The Australian Taxation Office website states that fringe benefits tax liability may arise for car parks provided by an employer for their employees where there is a commercial parking station within a one kilometre radius.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Workers Rehabilitation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-06-26">
            <name>HOSPITAL PARKING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-06-26T16:14:00" />
        <text id="20120626ff0492f6a6ee421490000307">
          <timeStamp time="2012-06-26T16:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Treasurer, Minister for Workers Rehabilitation, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (16:14):</by>  Treasury has carriage of the issue. It is currently a matter that is being scoped by the department. They have not provided any formal advice, but that would be one of the issues which would be considered as part of the scoping. I am not a taxation expert, but I would have thought that, for staff who are being provided with a car park, that would normally be picked up in FBT issues for those staff—</text>
        <text id="20120626ff0492f6a6ee421490000308">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120626ff0492f6a6ee421490000309">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120626ff0492f6a6ee421490000310">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  Well, then, I am more than happy to have a look at that and get some advice back, but, as I say, it is something which is being scoped. It is in the early stages, the business case is being prepared, and that will be brought to me to take a recommendation to cabinet.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>