<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-06-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1969" />
  <endPage num="2052" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="20120612bb8cef7383fd4bf2a0000228">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Local Government (Road Closures—1934 Act) Amendment Bill</name>
      <page num="1988" />
      <text id="20120612bb8cef7383fd4bf2a0000229">
        <heading>LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ROAD CLOSURES—1934 ACT) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <startTime time="2012-06-12T12:41:00" />
        <text id="20120612bb8cef7383fd4bf2a0000230">
          <timeStamp time="2012-06-12T12:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON (Croydon) (12:41):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="20120612bb8cef7383fd4bf2a0000231">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120612bb8cef7383fd4bf2a0000232">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  During debate on the Local Government (Road Closures—1934 Act) Amendment Bill, the member for Adelaide told the house I had a conflict of interest owing to my daughter's attending St Dominic's Priory College, Hill Street, North Adelaide. On 24 November 2011, the member for Adelaide told the house:</text>
        <text id="20120612bb8cef7383fd4bf2a0000233">
          <inserted>...yet in the 170 times that the member for Croydon has mentioned Barton Terrace West, and in his 67 speeches in this house, he has failed to declare his personal interest, given his daughter attended St Dominic's.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20120612bb8cef7383fd4bf2a0000234">On the last sitting Thursday I responded to the member for Adelaide's point, during the course of which I said, 'Suzie Roux made this claim in a letter sent to all members of parliament late last year.' When I became aware on Friday morning of Suzie Roux's and Chris Sumner's denial that they had included this claim of conflict of interest in their circular letter, I checked the letter and I am wrong. Suzie Roux and Chris Sumner did not make this point in their letter to all members of parliament about the bill. Accordingly, I withdraw that claim, amend the record and apologise to Suzie Roux and Chris Sumner.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>