<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-05-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1903" />
  <endPage num="1970" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bay to Birdwood</name>
      <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000754">
        <heading>BAY TO BIRDWOOD</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-31">
            <name>BAY TO BIRDWOOD</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-31T15:00:00" />
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000755">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-31T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (15:00):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Police. Why does the South Australian police department no longer have adequate resources to control one-way traffic on the Bay to Birdwood route between Tea Tree Gully and Birdwood? With your leave and that of the house, I will explain—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000756">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Member for Morphett, that was a question that had argument in it. However, continue with your explanation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1950" />
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000757">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE:</by>  The question will be put into context, Madam Speaker, by the explanation. Thousands of spectators and vintage car enthusiasts participate in this major tourist attraction, which has remained unchanged since 1986. The opposition is advised that the provision on one-way traffic was introduced in 1986 because of safety concerns for the Bay to Birdwood participants. The Vintage Sports Car Club of South Australia has stated:</text>
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000758">
          <inserted>...because SAPOL is of the opinion that it cannot justify the resources required to control the one-way traffic provisions, the section of the route from Tea Tree Gully to Birdwood will no longer be one-way traffic.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-05-31T15:01:00" />
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000759">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-31T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (15:01):</by>  Just a couple of things in response to this particular question. First and foremost, the commissioner makes a decision about how he allocates resources and I have every confidence that if he says that this is not an appropriate use of policing resources then perhaps it is not an appropriate use of policing resources. My understanding is that this particular year is no different to what it was last year, but the police are working with all the agencies and organisations that are involved in this.</text>
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000760">To say that the police do not have enough resources to service South Australians generally is quite a different thing, and I can say very categorically that we have almost doubled the police budget here in South Australia. We have 700 more sworn police officers here in South Australia, we are boosting their resources by another 313, and we have something like 1,000 support people supporting South Australian police in their duties.</text>
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000761">We have had a very strong history over the last 10 years of not only providing the police with the resources they need to do their jobs, but also with the tools to do their jobs; that is, the appropriate legislation that allows them to do their jobs, very strong policies in supporting South Australian police. However, I have to say that the last time I looked at the Liberal Party website it had no policy documents whatsoever about the police, and when you log in and say 'police/law/corrections/road safety' it says, 'Coming soon'.</text>
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000762">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120531c932924d165743b1b0000763">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>