<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-05-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1903" />
  <endPage num="1970" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mount Barker Infrastructure Projects</name>
      <text id="201205317d6ed2c072cc47c6a0000720">
        <heading>MOUNT BARKER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1805" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GOLDSWORTHY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kavel</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-31">
            <name>MOUNT BARKER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-31T14:50:00" />
        <text id="201205317d6ed2c072cc47c6a0000721">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-31T14:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1805">Mr GOLDSWORTHY (Kavel) (14:50):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. Can the minister advise whether negotiations have been finalised between the government and the developer consortia to determine the level of their funding contributions for infrastructure projects in Mount Barker? The government rezoned 1,310 hectares of land for residential development in Mount Barker. Part of the process that followed was the government negotiating with developers on the level of their contributions for infrastructure projects in the town.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-31">
            <name>MOUNT BARKER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-31T14:51:00" />
        <text id="201205317d6ed2c072cc47c6a0000722">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-31T14:51:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:51):</by>  I would not say they are concluded with respect to all infrastructure. There has been very substantial agreement reached on transport infrastructure, but, of course, transport infrastructure is only part of the picture. The last discussions I had were with a private water supplier who was seeking to convince the private consortia that that was a good model.</text>
        <text id="201205317d6ed2c072cc47c6a0000723">There is, of course, SA Water in the mix and its pricing and we have the council itself, which has sought to be involved in the provision of water infrastructure. Therefore, those matters are not concluded and I hope that what you will gain from my answer is an indication of the complexity of those infrastructures. In short, I think good arrangements have been reached in transport but there are other areas of infrastructure where there are many parties and many discussions still ongoing, including the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>