<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-05-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1595" />
  <endPage num="1673" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Flinders Medical Centre</name>
      <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000668">
        <heading>FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-16">
            <name>FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-16T14:42:00" />
        <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000669">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-16T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (14:42):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Health and Ageing. Is he concerned that the design of the new Flinders emergency department his government has built makes it difficult for patients to be admitted if there is a surge in ambulance arrivals, as the ambulance union claimed this morning?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-16">
            <name>FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-16T14:42:00" />
        <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000670">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-16T14:42:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts) (14:42):</by>  I heard the comments made by Phil Palmer in the media interview this morning, and that is obviously one of the issues that the independent investigator can consider in his team's investigation of the hospital. Bear in mind that the advice about how the emergency department should be constructed very much came from the doctors who run the emergency department at the hospital, so if they got it wrong it is as a result of the design that they wanted. I understand they were very happy with the design—</text>
        <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000671">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000672">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  No, I am just merely pointing out that there would be a difference of opinion as to whether or not it is a good design. The ambulance union has a view about it—</text>
        <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000673">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000674">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201205167b79881cee53413ab0000675">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  —presumably the doctors have another view; that is just another reflection, I guess, of the issues we are dealing with at that particular hospital. We will get an independent person to have a look at it and give some advice and, if there need to be alterations to the design, I am sure we can consider those as well.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>