<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-05-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1489" />
  <endPage num="1596" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Film Corporation</name>
      <text id="20120515e8e2221afbf7499f80000402">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN FILM CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-15">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN FILM CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20120515e8e2221afbf7499f80000403">In reply to <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg)</by> (29 March 2012).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-15">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN FILM CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20120515e8e2221afbf7499f80000404">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts):</by>  I am advised:</text>
        <page num="1515" />
        <text id="20120515e8e2221afbf7499f80000405">1.&amp;#x9;The figures Ms Chapman MP refers to in her questions are contained in the report produced by Aurecon, which was submitted to the Public Works Committee when the building of the Adelaide Studios was being considered. The report does not state how many jobs will be created at the Glenside film studios, which is the question that has been asked, rather, it provides an estimated forecast figure of direct and indirect employment as an outcome of film production activity in the state.</text>
        <text id="20120515e8e2221afbf7499f80000406">While we are only nine months into the 2011-12 financial year, there have been no calculations of employment as a result of film production in the state. However, 720 people have been employed in feature film, television and digital media projects that are linked to the South Australian Film Corporation's activities in production investment, development and business support, in the 2011-12 year to date. While this figure is not a measure of full time equivalents, the fact that 720 people have been employed in some capacity in film and television projects that the Film Corporation has been involved in indicates a level of activity that is not insubstantial.</text>
        <text id="20120515e8e2221afbf7499f80000407">2.&amp;#x9;Similarly, the $28.7 million figure contained in the report is an estimated figure of economic activity resulting from the investment in the Adelaide Studios for the 2011-12 financial year, and assumes a full year of business at the Adelaide Studios. Given that we are only three-quarters of the way through the financial year, commissioning an independent assessment of the economic impact to date has not been contemplated.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>