<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-05-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1307" />
  <endPage num="1415" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ministerial Code of Conduct</name>
      <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000604">
        <heading>MINISTERIAL CODE OF CONDUCT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-02">
            <name>MINISTERIAL CODE OF CONDUCT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-02T14:36:00" />
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000605">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-02T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:36): </by> My question is to the Minister for Health. How is the minister's conduct not a breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct when the minister told the house yesterday that the reason he asked the health department specifically to prepare material for the minister's use in the election during the caretaker period was '...blindingly obvious: so that we could find out the cost of the propositions the Liberal Party were putting to the public of South Australia', and '...to find out what the cost of your policies were so the public were better informed.' The Ministerial Code of Conduct states:</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000606">
          <inserted>Public servants should not be asked to work on party political matters. They should not be asked to specifically prepare material for ministers to use in the election when the government is in caretaker mode after an election has been called.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-02">
            <name>MINISTERIAL CODE OF CONDUCT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-02T14:37:00" />
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000607">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-02T14:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts) (14:37): </by> Madam Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition has asked the same question multiple times. I know she wants to keep fighting the last state election, but, as I said in my answer to the first question that was asked, discussions may include the administrative and technical practicalities—</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000608">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000609">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000610">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> —and procedures involved in implementing policies proposed by the opposition parties. It is entirely—</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000611">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000612">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000613">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000614">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Minister, there is a point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000615">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI: </by> The minister is obviously confused. We are now talking about the Ministerial Code of Conduct.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000616">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! There is no point of order there. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000617">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> It does not matter which document the opposition refers to—</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000618">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000619">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> Members on the other side might listen and give me the courtesy of listening. It does not matter which of the documents they refer to. The facts are that I asked factual questions. I did not ask my department to do anything improper. In fact, I did not ask them to do anything. My staff asked the questions, and, in fact—</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000620">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000621">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000622">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman: </by> That is pathetic, John!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000623">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Member for Bragg, order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000624">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> I was not blaming the staff at all. I have never done that.</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000625">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000626">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> Let us be clear about what is happening here. I am saying you said this. I am just being factual. Members of my staff, who operate under my instruction—and I said that yesterday—asked questions of departmental officers of a factual nature. That information was provided factually by the departmental officers; and, in fact, Madam Speaker—</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000627">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="12">The Hon. I.F. Evans interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000628">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Member for Davenport, order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000629">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> In fact, Madam Speaker, the emails that the opposition released yesterday to the media omitted several emails which were provided to them under FOI and which were initiated prior to the caretaker period when the original questions about costings were asked; and, in fact, the later emails sought clarification about some of that earlier information. So, if you want to be pedantic about it, that is exactly what happened. I know they are angry, I know they are still fighting the last election. My conscience is completely clear that I acted properly on all counts.</text>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000630">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012050256857510bdf54b60b0000631">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>