<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-05-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1237" />
  <endPage num="1308" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health Department Accounts</name>
      <text id="201205018130f3cae4c64da190000535">
        <heading>HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-01">
            <name>HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-01T15:02:00" />
        <page num="1274" />
        <text id="201205018130f3cae4c64da190000536">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-01T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (15:02):</by>  My question is for the Minister for Health and Ageing. Why did the minister use a figure of $60 million for the reconciliation figure in the SA Health accounts in today's ministerial statement when the Auditor-General's office told the Economic and Finance Committee the figure was $90 million when they got involved?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-05-01">
            <name>HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-05-01T15:02:00" />
        <text id="201205018130f3cae4c64da190000537">
          <timeStamp time="2012-05-01T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts) (15:02):</by>  The $60 million figure was the figure I recall that I most recently gave the house. It started off at a higher level and it has come down, so I think $60 million was the last figure that I informed the house of. If you recall, when the question was first put to—I think, the Treasurer in my absence—the allegation was that it was $200 million that was due to be reconciled. I think I came back and said—</text>
        <text id="201205018130f3cae4c64da190000538">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">The Hon. J.J. Snelling interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201205018130f3cae4c64da190000539">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  A blowout. I came back and I indicated, I think, that it had been $90 million and it had got down to $60 million. I will check the details of this but, as I understand it, that was the last figure that I had given the house, and I am now telling you that it is down to below $3 million, and all of the issues associated with it. The important point is that reconciliation from the 18 legacy accounts into the new Oracle system is largely complete and there is less than $3 million to be finalised, and it is being finalised at the moment.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>