<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-04-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1161" />
  <endPage num="1239" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Electoral (Optional Preferential Voting) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000059">
        <heading>ELECTORAL (OPTIONAL PREFERENTIAL VOTING) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000060">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="2819" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. R.B. SUCH</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Fisher</electorate>
          <startTime time="2012-04-05T10:47:00" />
          <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000061">
            <timeStamp time="2012-04-05T10:47:00" />
            <by role="member" id="2819">The Hon. R.B. SUCH (Fisher) (10:47):</by>  Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Electoral Act 1985. Read a first time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000062">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="2819" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. R.B. SUCH</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Fisher</electorate>
          <startTime time="2012-04-05T10:48:00" />
          <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000063">
            <timeStamp time="2012-04-05T10:48:00" />
            <by role="member" id="2819">The Hon. R.B. SUCH (Fisher) (10:48):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000064">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000065">This is also a reintroduction. This bill is about optional preferential voting. From time to time, many people have expressed concern that they felt forced to give a preference to someone they do not wish to. Under our system, basically, they are compelled to.</text>
          <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000066">What this bill does is provide that the allocation of preferences is an optional matter. I believe that is very important. We currently have a legal challenge to the whole question of whether our voting, at the federal level anyway, is compulsory or voluntary, but we have within our system compulsion with regard to allocating preferences. I think this measure is worthy of support to allow people to decide whether or not they allocate a preference to someone. Many people do not wish to be forced to allocate a preference and this bill will give them the right not to do so.</text>
          <text id="201204053140797e95d2445f80000067">Debate adjourned on motion of Mrs Geraghty.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>