<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-04-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1087" />
  <endPage num="1162" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Economy</name>
      <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000370">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-04-04">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-04-04T14:18:00" />
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000371">
          <timeStamp time="2012-04-04T14:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:18):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Finance. If South Australia is not in recession, why are building approval figures at 11-year lows, property sales figures at 27-year lows, retail sales figures the worst in the nation and fewer people in full-time employment than there were when your government promised 100,000 new jobs?</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000372">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000373">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-04-04T14:18:00" />
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000374">
          <timeStamp time="2012-04-04T14:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (14:18):</by>  Can I supply to the house some other material which gives an entirely different perspective about the South Australian economy. Those opposite obviously seek to scrounge around for all of the material that they can find to talk down the South Australian economy.</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000375">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000376">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000377">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  We know from the most recent published data in relation to gross state product that the South Australian economy grew by a solid 2.4 per cent in 2010-11. They are the most recent gross state product figures, and that was above the economic growth rate of the national average, which was 2.1 per cent. They are the last published figures. The next gross state product figures will be published later this year and we will compare them with last year. That is the present state of play and what we know about the growth of our state economy. I am sure you can find some areas of the economy that will be performing more strongly than others, but to selectively choose those areas of the economy which are not growing strongly—</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000378">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000379">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000380">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —and ignore others that are growing strongly—</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000381">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000382">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1114" />
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000383">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —creates an entirely inappropriate picture of the South Australian economy. So, I simply supply some additional material which will allow the house to put what has just been said in context and it is this: overall new business investment in South Australia rose by 4.3 per cent in the December quarter 2011; the state's unemployment rate of 5.2 per cent is down from 5.5 per cent a year ago. So, it has come down from a year ago—not gone up, gone down from a year ago.</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000384">Spending on mining and petroleum exploration increased by 57 per cent through the year to September 2011 and, in trend terms, compared with national growth of 45 per cent during the same period—so higher than national trend growth over the same period in respect of spending on mineral and petroleum exploration. What could be a stronger indicator of the health of the economy for the future? South Australian crop production, the very numbers that are not included in state final demand—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000385">
          <by role="member" id="619">An honourable member:</by>  Yes, it rained.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000386">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  I'm sorry, we actually regard grain as part of the economy.</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000387">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000388">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000389">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  The South Australian crop production in 2011-12 looks likely to be the third highest on record, following the record crop in 2010-11. Is it not worthy to mention these things and create a complete picture of the economy, rather than seeking to choose those things which create a false impression of the South Australian economy? There is a record total of $109 billion worth of major projects occurring or in the planning stage in this state and the state government is, obviously, undertaking the very substantial capital works that I referred to before.</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000390">What would be the motivation of those opposite to actually talk down the South Australian economy in this way? Why would they choose—</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000391">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000392">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000393">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —to do that? All of this material was canvassed a few weeks ago. What would be the motivation in returning to it, except calculating to reduce confidence in the South Australian economy? Why would you do that? Why would you actually do that? There is no new information in the public sphere. This is precisely the way they do their business: they wake up in the morning, they read the paper and then they tell us all what it means. Well, we can read.</text>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000394">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000395">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000396">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker. The Premier is now debating the answer to the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201204049b07041ba2c8464280000397">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Thank you for that, Deputy Leader of the Opposition. I think the Premier has finished his answer. The member for Light.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>