<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-04-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1015" />
  <endPage num="1088" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000485">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-04-03">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-04-03T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000486">
          <timeStamp time="2012-04-03T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (15:06):</by>  Given the minister's answer that it would provide much more scrutiny by giving it to the whole house, does the minister concede that the legislation surrounding the IDC committee provides for confidential evidence to be given by witnesses such as Holden's so that both sides of the house can be advised of confidential matters, and debating it before the parliament does not allow Holden's to advise the opposition of that confidential information because it will be made public?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Manufacturing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-04-03">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-04-03T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000487">
          <timeStamp time="2012-04-03T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Minister for Manufacturing, Innovation and Trade, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (15:06):</by>  I thank the member for his question and his keen interest in this, and I understand he made some public remarks about not releasing information that was commercial-in-confidence for GMH. The Liberal Party were given a briefing by Holden's.</text>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000488">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000489">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I don't know why that's funny. I do not know why a private company that is investing a billion dollars in South Australia is somehow a laughing matter. The opposition were given private briefings with the company. They were allowed to ask any question that they wanted to ask.</text>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000490">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000491">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000492">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  The government never attempted to censor the opposition or what questions they could ask. They could ask any question they wanted. In fact, the shadow treasurer went on radio and talked about the importance of keeping that information in confidence. They could have asked any question they wanted to of Holden. The government made a decision that the best place to debate this was in the house, where everyone got a say—every single member got a say.</text>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000493">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000494">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000495">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  Anyway, you have proved you can't be trusted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000496">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000497">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Madam Speaker, I ask him to withdraw that remark.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000498">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Deputy leader, I would ask you to withdraw that remark.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000499">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  Withdraw the remark that he proved that he can't be trusted because he says one thing on radio and another thing in the house? I withdraw it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000500">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I simply make the point that the deputy leader is—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000501">
          <by role="member" id="619">An honourable member:</by>  Sook, sook, sook!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000502">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  It is also out of order to call someone a sook, sook, sook. I have to say, if you know me you will know I am not a sook, sook, sook. The Deputy Leader of the Opposition—</text>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000503">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000504">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1049" />
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000505">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  —knows it is out of order to get up and repeat the insult while pretending to withdraw it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120403e7899abb25724517b0000506">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> I am sure that the deputy leader does know that, but we will move on.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>