<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-03-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="965" />
  <endPage num="1016" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Film Corporation</name>
      <text id="20120329d44fd3b09f324fb8a0000676">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN FILM CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-29">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN FILM CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-29T14:57:00" />
        <text id="20120329d44fd3b09f324fb8a0000677">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-29T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (14:57):</by>  As the shadow minister for women, congratulations, also, on that acknowledgement. My question is to the Minister for the Arts. Minister, the annual report of the South Australian Film Corporation for the year ending 30 June 2011, which you tabled today and which is marked 'Parliamentary Version', is that the same annual report that was leaked to <term>The Australian</term> yesterday and published in <term>The Australian</term> as having been received by <term>The Australian</term> and, if not, will you explain what difference there is? Secondly, will you identify if the report that was leaked to <term>The Australian</term> identified the operational deficit for the year to date, on page 47, as $39,397?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-29">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN FILM CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-29T14:58:00" />
        <text id="20120329d44fd3b09f324fb8a0000678">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-29T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts) (14:58):</by>  You would have to ask <term>The Australian</term> what copy they have got and whether it compares to the one I have got. I imagine it is the same. I do not think it was actually leaked. It was given by one of our very helpful staff, so I do not think that is really in the category of 'leak'. It is probably in the category of mistakenly given rather than leaked to <term>The Australian</term>, but I have not checked the two.</text>
        <text id="20120329d44fd3b09f324fb8a0000679">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120329d44fd3b09f324fb8a0000680">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  I would explain to the leader, who interjected why haven't I given it: because it had not at that stage been agreed to by the board of the SA Film Corporation and, after they had tabled it, it was not sent to me. Now that it has been agreed to by them, it was sent to me, and, as soon as I received it, I tabled it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>