<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-03-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="873" />
  <endPage num="967" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>GM Holden</name>
      <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000458">
        <heading>GM HOLDEN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-28">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-28T14:30:00" />
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000459">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-28T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:30):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Manufacturing, Innovation and Trade. How did the minister get it wrong in two separate interviews on 22 March in relation to the Holden funding agreement and the issue of no forced redundancies? The minister said at a media conference on 22 March, 'What we've guaranteed here is a workforce that will be building two new platforms with no forced redundancies...' Then he said, later that day on radio, 'The guarantees we've got are no forced redundancies...they've promised no forced redundancies.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Manufacturing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-28">
            <name>GM HOLDEN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-28T14:30:00" />
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000460">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-28T14:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Minister for Manufacturing, Innovation and Trade, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (14:30):</by>  The difference is that Holden have a policy of no forced redundancies and they are investing $1 billion. So, if you listened to your own comments, you would realise the error. What I did—</text>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000461">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000462">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000463">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000464">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Exactly. I said you would realise the error.</text>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000465">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="74">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000466">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000467">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000468">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Exactly; that is why I did. I just said I did. I understand that members opposite are so vain they can never apologise about anything. When I get something wrong, I apologise. I 'fess up. If we look opposite and see who apologises over there, I have heard no apology from the member for Unley about introducing fake documents to the parliament.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000469">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  Point of order: the minister is debating the answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000470">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I made my points very clear on radio this morning. Holden have a policy of no forced redundancies at Elizabeth. The government has leveraged $1 billion worth of private investment into Holden's, guaranteeing two new platforms being built and production at Holden's until 2022. Only the Liberal Party would think that that is a bad thing.</text>
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000471">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="905" />
        <text id="20120328a86443c051264e3a90000472">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Taylor.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>