<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-03-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="805" />
  <endPage num="874" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Consultants and Contractors</name>
      <text id="201203271f637fbefe85485f90000315">
        <heading>CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-27">
            <name>CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201203271f637fbefe85485f90000316">In reply to <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg)</by> (8 November 2011) (First Session).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-27">
            <name>CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201203271f637fbefe85485f90000317">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Business Services and Consumers):</by>  The Attorney-General has received this advice:</text>
        <text id="201203271f637fbefe85485f90000318">Specific building and facilities related consultancies were related to:</text>
        <text id="201203271f637fbefe85485f90000319">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">A review of security systems across Court facilities which was undertaken by the consultancy firm SKM at a cost of $41,899.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201203271f637fbefe85485f90000320">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">A comprehensive review of the maintenance and building code compliance upgrade requirements of the Supreme Court precinct. This includes disability requirements for the Supreme Court precinct. This work was undertaken by Dash Architects at a cost of $154,130.</item>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>