<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-03-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="725" />
  <endPage num="806" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Printer Cartridge Scam</name>
      <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000644">
        <heading>PRINTER CARTRIDGE SCAM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-15">
            <name>PRINTER CARTRIDGE SCAM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-15T14:44:00" />
        <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000645">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-15T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:44):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Finance. Has the minister received advice that senior Treasury officers were advised in mid-2010 of purchases by Treasury officers of printer cartridges from suspect companies and that this issue was not referred to the Auditor-General or to the Government Investigations Unit and that no disciplinary action was taken against any officer and, if so, why is there no mention of this in the report of the procurement working group?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-15">
            <name>PRINTER CARTRIDGE SCAM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-15T14:44:00" />
        <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000646">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-15T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Finance, Minister for the Public Sector) (14:44):</by>  I thank the member for Davenport for the question. My role has been very hands-off. I was the instigator, the convenor of the working group, which was chaired by Jim Hallion. I attended as an observer. I had some input in terms of pushing matters along—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000647">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  We know about observers with the government.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000648">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000649">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Were you a real one?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000650">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201203156e28b65193564f1490000651">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Yes, I was a real one. Given the fact that we were dealing with the actions of public servants and that there was disciplinary action that could flow from our investigations which were carried out, I did not at any stage interrogate the identity of any individual in any agency. I remained very much at arm's length from the investigations so that there could be no accusation of ministerial contamination of the process.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>