<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-03-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="725" />
  <endPage num="806" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Ministerial Statement</name>
    <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000364">
      <heading>Ministerial Statement</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Members' Travel Provisions</name>
      <page num="752" />
      <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000365">
        <heading>MEMBERS' TRAVEL PROVISIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-03-15T14:04:00" />
        <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000366">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-15T14:04:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (14:04):</by>  I seek leave to make a ministerial statement.</text>
        <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000367">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000368">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  On 22 November last year I announced the intention of the government to refer the provision for spouses, domestic partners or family members to accompany members on parliamentary travel to the Remuneration Tribunal. When I did so, I acknowledged that there were legitimate community concerns about aspects of the travel provisions.</text>
        <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000369">I said that, while travel for members of parliament is not particularly popular, it can make a valuable contribution to our legislature. I indicated that I shared with the community their concern about whether accessing a travel allowance for partners or family remains appropriate. However, I acknowledge that there may be occasions when it may be appropriate for a member of parliament to be accompanied by a family member.</text>
        <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000370">On 27 November last year, I wrote to the Remuneration Tribunal to ask it to review these provisions. The government then provided a submission to the Remuneration Tribunal. In that submission, we submitted that there should no longer be an entitlement for a member of parliament to access the travel allowance to provide for the accompaniment of a family member but that there should be a discretion to authorise such access in a particular case, where there were reasons sufficient to justify public expenditure of funds to provide for the accompaniment.</text>
        <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000371">The tribunal has now reported and determined a new set of rules. The report and rules were received in my office earlier today. The new rules set out by the tribunal improve elements of transparency and accountability associated with parliamentary travel; remove the entitlement of spouses and domestic partners to access the travel allowance except in approved circumstances, in particular, where the spouse or partner is formally invited to attend an official function with the member; preclude family members, other than spouses or domestic partners, from accessing the travel allowance; and provide for the cost of carer's travel, where the member has special physical or medical needs, upon application to the Remuneration Tribunal.</text>
        <text id="201203157f5502bf33c8446f90000372">I thank the tribunal for its consideration of this matter and for its determination. In the government's view, the determination strikes a good balance and better reflects community sentiment on this issue. The new rules are being gazetted today. I seek leave to table to the report and determination.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>