<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-03-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="595" />
  <endPage num="728" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Statutes Amendment (Attorney-General's Portfolio) Bill</name>
      <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001703">
        <heading>STATUTES AMENDMENT (ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S PORTFOLIO) BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001704">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001705">In committee.</text>
        <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001706">(Continued from 13 March 2012.)</text>
        <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001707">Clause 1.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="1804">
          <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001708">
            <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Given the exchange yesterday with the Attorney, I reiterate that I had indicated that there were three prospective amendments from the opposition. One strengthened the protection of self-represented parties in relation to the statement of agreed facts proposal in the bill. The Attorney-General pointed out that he felt that a subclause of the current bill covered that matter; although it is not exactly the same as the court making an order, it can't be done without permission, and I think that matter will be resolved and, if it is not, they can talk about it in the other place, and they will certainly do that.</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001709">The second matter was to retain the status quo of correctional services officers issuing direction to offenders under supervision. We will have a look at that again, so I indicate that there may be something in the other place, but it seems as though that is near resolution.</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001710">The final matter relates to the delegation power by the Director of Public Prosecutions, which is considered in clause 13 with the addition of a new section 6A. The opposition will be opposing that clause. So, I invite you, Mr Chairman, to present to the committee, clauses 1 to 12, and I indicate that the opposition will be supporting those, but I will be seeking a vote on clause 13; otherwise the bill will be consented to.</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001711">Clause passed.</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001712">Clauses 2 to 12 passed.</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001713">Clause 13.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1804">
          <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001714">
            <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  On this clause, I indicate that the opposition opposes it, for the reasons I have outlined in the second reading address.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1810">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001715">
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I thank the honourable member for her support for clauses 1 to 12. In respect of clause 13, I am still not entirely clear on exactly what the nature of the amendment might be, and for that reason—</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001716">
            <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
          </text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1810">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001717">
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Yes, I will oppose it, but, in doing so, I just want to put on the record that it may or may not be that what ultimately is the form of the amendment is completely objectionable. I do not know because I have not seen it. There may be things that are capable of being resolved. But I do not know that presently, and for that reason we would urge that existing clause 13 be adopted.</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001718">Clause passed.</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001719">Remaining clauses (14 to 23) and title passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001720">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Deputy Premier</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Attorney-General</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Planning</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2012-03-14T16:06:00" />
          <page num="676" />
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001721">
            <timeStamp time="2012-03-14T16:06:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (16:06):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001722">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a third time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2012031480999aa7f63b42e6a0001723">Bill read a third time and passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>