<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-03-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="595" />
  <endPage num="728" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mcgee, Mr Eugene</name>
      <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000396">
        <heading>MCGEE, MR EUGENE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-14">
            <name>MCGEE, MR EUGENE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-14T14:20:00" />
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000397">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-14T14:20:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:20):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier support his Attorney-General's view that the Eugene McGee case should not be referred to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal or does the Premier support the former attorney's view that it should be?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-03-14">
            <name>MCGEE, MR EUGENE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-03-14T14:20:00" />
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000398">
          <timeStamp time="2012-03-14T14:20:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (14:20):</by>  This is an extraordinary question from the Leader of the Opposition, because on 8 December last year she approved the Attorney-General's handling of this issue by saying that the Attorney-General was correct at law, and that the only way—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000399">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker.</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000400">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000401">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000402">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  Anything that I said last year has nothing to do with whether the Premier thinks—</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000403">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000404">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Thank you; sit down.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000405">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  —that the issue should be referred to the disciplinary tribunal.</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000406">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000407">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I have no idea what you just said, Leader of the Opposition, as—</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000408">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000409">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! There was yelling from both sides. Premier, continue to answer; I do not uphold that point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="626" />
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000410">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  My view has been powerfully influenced by the Leader of the Opposition who, in December last year—</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000411">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000412">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000413">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —approved the Attorney-General's handling of the issue, saying 'the Attorney-General is correct at law' and that 'the only way to deal with it is to stop it from happening again.'</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000414">I might say that the Attorney-General has done just that. He has taken steps just yesterday to introduce legislation that will ensure that the injustice—that I think we all share in this house—that was done to Mr Ian Humphrey and his family will not be perpetrated again. I believe all right-thinking members of this chamber share the distress—of course we cannot share the depth of it—felt by Ms Di Gilchrist-Humphrey and her family for the lack of justice they have received as a result of this incident.</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000415">What we have seen from day one, in relation to this matter, is the previous attorney-general, the present member for Croydon, taking significant steps—</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000416">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000417">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000418">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —to respond to what we felt was an injustice by: increasing the maximum penalty for death by dangerous driving from 10 to 15 years; by creating an offence of aggravated death by dangerous driving with a maximum penalty of life in prison; creating an offence of leaving an accident scene after causing death or harm by careless driving, with a maximum penalty of 15 years' imprisonment; increasing the maximum penalty for failure to stop and assist where a person was killed from a $5,000 fine to a 5-year imprisonment; creating an offence of aggravated driving without due care, with a maximum penalty of 12 years' imprisonment; creating a presumption against bail for any driver accused of breaking these laws; requiring written notice of intent to introduce an expert witness at trial at least 28 days before the trial.</text>
        <text id="2012031431e39703ebca4ba380000419">We are responding, and continue to respond, to what we feel is an enormous injustice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>