<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="369" />
  <endPage num="435" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health Department Staff</name>
      <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000674">
        <heading>HEALTH DEPARTMENT STAFF</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-29">
            <name>HEALTH DEPARTMENT STAFF</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-29T15:09:00" />
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000675">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-29T15:09:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:09): </by> Supplementary, Madam Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000676">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000677">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> The minister in answer to the question said that none of the people currently employed doing this work would lose their jobs. Does that mean that the government is going to employ one or other of these contractors to do this work and continue to employ the same people who have been doing the work so far and then claim this as a saving?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-02-29T15:10:00" />
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000678">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-29T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts) (15:10):</by>  If I can explain, and I thank the member for the question. There are two ways of doing it: there is Spotless and the government agency. Both could provide the service. The workers could choose to work with Spotless if they wanted to. I understand that there is some incentive payment that is available to them if they want to transfer their employment across to Spotless, or they could stay working for the—</text>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000679">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="22">Mr Hamilton-Smith interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000680">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, member for Waite!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000681">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  They could stay working for the government entity and keep their government employment industrial benefits and all the rest of it, and provide the services from the government entity. Alternatively, they could say that they do not want to be part of either of those and they can seek work elsewhere in government. They are the options that it would go through.</text>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000682">The benefit, as I understand it, comes from having an agency which is focused on the maintenance and management of those services, so that Health, as well as running health services, does not have to do these. The benefits from having a centralised agency which looks after particular kinds of services then flow; so that is where we get the savings, not by reducing, necessarily, the number of workers.</text>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000683">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012022951d3d62818f3482290000684">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I'm sorry, question time has finished.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>