<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="369" />
  <endPage num="435" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Port Adelaide</name>
      <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000550">
        <heading>PORT ADELAIDE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-29">
            <name>PORT ADELAIDE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-29T14:52:00" />
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000551">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-29T14:52:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (14:52):</by>  My question is for the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. When did the minister provide cabinet with a copy or even a summary of, and I quote, 'Optimum decision making framework and precinct level multi criteria analysis' in respect of government-owned land at the Port Adelaide waterfront, including Newport Quays, and received by the Land Management Corporation on 3 June 2010; and what is the financial exposure for taxpayers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000552">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> The Minister for Transport, I hope you understood that question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-02-29T14:53:00" />
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000553">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-29T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:53):</by>  Come again? I actually don't really understand the import of the question. I would need to have it again, I'm sorry.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000554">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Do you want me to read it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000555">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Member for Bragg.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000556">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  When did the minister provide cabinet with a copy or even a summary of, and I quote—have you got your pen ready—'Optimum decision making framework and precinct level multi criteria analysis'? It's a document. When did you provide that to cabinet, in respect of the government's own land at Port Adelaide waterfront, including Newport Quays? The Land Management Corporation received it on 3 June 2010. And what is the financial consequence of that to taxpayers?</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000557">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000558">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  I'll let you read it. You can phone a friend—Rod Hook.</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000559">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000560">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Minister. I point out that the question took almost as long as the four minutes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000561">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Under four minutes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000562">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Minister, do you have a response?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000563">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Well, I would wonder why the member for Bragg believes I did present it or a summary. She obviously hasn't decided whether I presented it or a summary, but I will leave her—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000564">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000565">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I will leave her to ponder through that.</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000566">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000567">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  No, it was two questions; you don't understand. I will leave her to ponder through that, but I assume the member for Bragg is referring to cabinet's decision to terminate our relationship with Newport Quays.</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000568">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000569">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  No, actually you asked a number of questions; you asked whether I—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000570">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="402" />
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000571">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  You asked when I gave them the report, or when I gave them the summary. Now, those two things aren't mutually consistent; I would like to know which one you think I did.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000572">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Either.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000573">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Either? So you don't know what I did? Okay—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000574">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000575">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Okay, and you want to know what the cost to the taxpayer is of me presenting that report or that summary. So, which one; the report or the summary?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000576">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Either.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000577">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I don't think it costs us anything to provide a report or a summary to cabinet.</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000578">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000579">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  No, let's be clear here: we came into this place today and the opposition complained about new standing orders—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000580">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000581">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000582">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000583">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Just a moment, minister. Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000584">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  This is clearly debate, Madam Speaker—clearly debate. It doesn't relate to the question whatsoever.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000585">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> I don't uphold that point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000586">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  With the greatest respect, Madam Speaker, you would have to be Nostradamus—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000587">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Point of order, member for Davenport.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000588">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  Standing order 127: the minister can't digress. He is digressing from the question in regard to the cabinet document. He is seeking to talk about a debate this morning about standing orders.</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000589">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000590">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> I think it is within the context of the question. However, I refer you back to the substance of the question, minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000591">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I simply make the point that the opposition come here and complain about not getting answers when what has occurred today is a deliberate attempt to somehow hide whatever question it is they are trying to ask. All I would say is—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000592">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000593">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000594">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  All I would say is that you—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000595">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000596">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  And if you particularly believe that I am a simple man, give me a simple question, and I'll answer it. What we heard today was apparently, in asking people to abide by the standing orders, was that it was the jackboot of tyranny. Can I say: more the gumboot of hyperbole.</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000597">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000598">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000599">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  But I say this: if the member for Bragg believes that I gave a document to the cabinet—or a summary; whichever she believes—which caused lost cost exposure to the taxpayer, I am quite happy to hear the question in a less obscure fashion. I am a simple man; I just ask her forbearance and ask me the question in simple terms.</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000600">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000601">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Member for Bragg.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000602">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  I am happy to make it clear. He has the name of the report down there, and my question was: when—w-h-e-n—did you provide that or a summary of it to cabinet?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000603">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Which did I do?</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000604">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000605">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Minister, do you have anything further to add?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000606">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  What I would say is, if documents were presented to cabinet and considered by cabinet—I would point out, as John Hill, the Minister for Health, pointed out earlier, we actually do not disclose what goes on in cabinet, unlike—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000607">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Julia Rudd!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000608">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000609">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  —the habits of former governments, but if the member has a discernible question which doesn't involve a breach of cabinet confidentiality, I am more than—but I repeat this: don't come in here—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000610">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000611">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Don't come into this—</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000612">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000613">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Don't come into this place complaining you don't get answers when you ask obscure—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000614">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000615">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  If the minister is incapable of answering the question, he should just simply sit down and not abuse the opposition for asking a question which he is obviously incapable of answering.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000616">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Thank you, member for MacKillop; we don't need any more from you. Minister, have you finished answering your question?</text>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000617">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120229b50c6e5699334927b0000618">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Are there any more questions? I don't appear to have any more questions. Member for Chaffey.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>