<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="297" />
  <endPage num="371" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cavan Training Centre</name>
      <text id="20120228e012bfa36c604580b0000399">
        <heading>CAVAN TRAINING CENTRE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-28">
            <name>CAVAN TRAINING CENTRE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-28T14:21:00" />
        <text id="20120228e012bfa36c604580b0000400">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-28T14:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:21): </by> My question is again to the Premier. Will the Premier advise the house if last night's escape from the Cavan secure youth facility was a result of overcrowding, understaffing and/or the transfer of too many young offenders from Magill in recent months?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-28">
            <name>CAVAN TRAINING CENTRE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-28T14:21:00" />
        <text id="20120228e012bfa36c604580b0000401">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-28T14:21:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (14:21): </by> If the member had listened to my first answer, she would have had most of the substance of the question that she has just framed. I have just said that the maximum occupancy at Cavan Training Centre is 36 and the occupancy level at Cavan on the day of the incident was 29. There was an appropriate ratio of staff on duty at both the Cavan and Magill facilities last night, so the question of staffing I do not think lies at the heart of this, although that will be a matter for the investigation, and I do not want to pre-empt that.</text>
        <text id="20120228e012bfa36c604580b0000402">What we had here is obviously a calculated attempt to prepare for the escape. I do not know whether the particular incident was a calculated distraction but that, no doubt, will emerge from the course of the investigations. All those things we will become aware of. If there are recommendations that flow in terms of staffing or processes, then no doubt we will consider them carefully.</text>
        <page num="327" />
        <text id="20120228e012bfa36c604580b0000403">We have been as open as we can as quickly as we can. The information that was provided to the police which permitted them to release names and identify the particular children, which is an exception to the general rule about protecting their identity, was done in the interests of public safety. This was a particular exception to that general principle. I understand that was an important factor in at least two of the escapees being detained. Seven of them are now back in custody and we are still searching for that last one. We will learn whatever the lessons are to be learnt from this escape.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>