<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="77" />
  <endPage num="196" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001421">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Organised Crime</name>
      <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001422">
        <heading>ORGANISED CRIME</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="speech">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <startTime time="2012-02-15T15:13:00" />
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001423">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-15T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (15:13):</by>  Over the last 10 years the government—</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001424">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001425">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I can't hear the member for Bragg, which is surprising; it must be very noisy.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001426">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Indeed, I will speak up, Madam Speaker. Over the last 10 years the government's response to protect South Australians against organised crime has been manifestly inadequate. Indeed, notwithstanding all of Labor's rhetoric and poor strategy, we actually have a situation that is much worse. There are now more members of outlaw gangs. In the last three years since legislation, that is, the original Serious and Organised Crime Act, outlaw motorcycle gangs' membership is up 10 per cent from to 250 to 274. We have more gangs. The New Boyz street gang has transformed into the Comancheros. We have no fewer bikie fortresses. The situation out on the streets is more dangerous, where the internal controls have been weakened. There is more fear in the community, where South Australians walking locally at night feel the least safe of any—</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001427">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">The Hon. M.J. Atkinson interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001428">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, member for Croydon!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001429">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  I am happy to provide all that to the member for Croydon. The crime rate follows the national trend for South Australian homicide riders equal highest of any state. Yesterday, however, the Premier theatrically delivered an impassioned ministerial statement calling for a range of legislative measures relating to organised crime to be passed. The hypocrisy of the Premier in his statement is astounding. In that statement he named three pieces of legislation, which supposedly demonstrate that the Liberal opposition was deliberately obstructing the government's agenda to address organised crime. He could not have been more wrong.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001430">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> Point of order, ma'am.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001431">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN: </by> I have not mentioned the debate yet, Michael. Sit down.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001432">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Member for Croydon, you have a point of order?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001433">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> Yes, it is completely disorderly to anticipate debate on orders of the day. There are bills before the house directly on this topic, and the member for Bragg is canvassing the merits of those bills and the Liberal opposition's response to them.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001434">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Then I will listen carefully to what the member for Bragg is saying.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001435">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN: </by> Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am sure that you will at least read standing order 117; obviously, the member for Croydon has not. The Premier made a desperate attempt to pass the buck of his own slackness. The government has only itself to blame, and yesterday in his ministerial statement the Premier said:</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001436">
          <inserted>Recent events highlight the need for this parliament to act swiftly, and it is critical that this package of legislation is supported and passed as a matter of urgency.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001437">That at best was seen as a plea to the parliament that there was some extraneous events that required our action immediately; and, in fact, yesterday, when one of the pieces of legislation that was promised was introduced, the parliament did receive that and the opposition acted promptly on it. We have not finished it, apparently, because the minister, of course, is still in response. However, I do not want to get into the merits of that legislation. We will, of course, continue to debate that as they come forward.</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001438">What I do want to say, though, is that the situation of urgency that has prevailed in fact is that there has been an explosion in the community and in the public arena of events and of conduct resulting in fact in the death of one young man, which has been clearly in a circumstance where organised crime is overtly and quite profoundly in the face of every South Australian. They are concerned about it, and the government, via its Premier, has to come in here and try to blame someone else for the failure of this situation.</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001439">I want to outline what the opposition has tried to do in the last 12 months while we have been waiting month after month for these previous pieces of legislation to come through in a legislative response. While we have been waiting for this, we have also been trying to say to the government and to the parliament (but to the government in particular), 'We also want to make it an offence, for example, to take offensive weapons into schools.' No law on that.</text>
        <page num="167" />
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001440">We want to make sure that anyone who is a volunteer at a barbecue is not criminalised when they give out plastic knives and forks to young people. No law on that, but we wanted to do it. The government held it up. We wanted to ensure that medical reporting provisions were clear so that police have information to target crime hotspots. We wanted that medical report in. The government said no; it has obstructed that legislation. That is very important.</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001441">We wanted to amend other legislation to ensure that searches were robust, and we wanted to ensure that we assist police against any risk of litigation and people being searched at risk of abuse. We wanted to make sure that the police were protected on this. What was the government's response? No. That amendment, that legislation, has not passed here. We wanted to make sure that the problems of drafting did not end up in the High Court like the mess we have had over the last two years.</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001442">We wanted to make sure that this was correct, that it was going to be workable and that we insist on having legislation that works; and, in addition to that, to insist that the government get out there and catch the criminals—</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001443">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001444">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN: </by> —I haven't finished the sentence yet—rather than come in here and bleat about their failures.</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001445">Time expired.</text>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001446">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Acting Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hon. M.J. Wright</electorate>
        <text id="2012021579c34c4b0dab4d0ba0001447">
          <by role="member" id="619">The ACTING SPEAKER (Hon. M.J. Wright):</by>  Order! Member for Light.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>