<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="77" />
  <endPage num="196" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>ForestrySA</name>
      <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001232">
        <heading>FORESTRYSA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-15">
            <name>FORESTRYSA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-15T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001233">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-15T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:39):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Can he explain why it is good policy to sell the harvesting rights to the state's forests, which produce an income for the state, when the government has announced a committee to consider establishing a future fund to produce an income for the state?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Workers Rehabilitation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-15">
            <name>FORESTRYSA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-15T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001234">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-15T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Treasurer, Minister for Workers Rehabilitation, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (14:39):</by>  There is a complete difference between the government being an owner/operator of forestry assets and a government entity like a future fund investing in partnership with a commercial—</text>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001235">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001236">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, member for Norwood!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001237">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  —forestry operator and investing in an asset. They are completely different. I am surprised that the member for Davenport lacks the economic literacy to understand the distinction—</text>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001238">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001239">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001240">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  They are so rattled after their so-called love-in down in Mount Gambier, where the Leader of the Opposition was pulling knives out of her back.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001241">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker. This has no relevance to the question asked. Might I suggest, Madam Speaker, that if ministers learn to answer questions as per standing order 97, question time might go a lot more peacefully.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001242">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker. Shall I explain this to you?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001243">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> If members did not interject, we would not have this problem. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001244">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  You need a standing order to be able to speak. You need one. Let me explain it to you. For the benefit of the Leader of the Opposition, who does not believe it, interjections are out of order—</text>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001245">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="74">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001246">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order! Member for Norwood, you are warned for the second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001247">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  If I can help the member for Norwood, the point is that you need a standing order to be able to speak. You need an order.</text>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001248">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="157" />
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001249">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I am taking a point of order. I am allowed to do that. Interjections, you are not allowed to do. Now, unless you have another question about animals, I suggest you keep quiet. I simply make the point, Madam Speaker, that the Treasurer was answering the question entirely on point until interrupted by a barrage of out-of-order interjections.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001250">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker. Is it not out of order to respond to interjections?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001251">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> That was my point and the minister's point exactly. Treasurer, could you get back to the substance of the question, please?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001252">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  Madam Speaker, I apologise, indeed. The fact is that we have had a very pleasing level of initial interest in the forward sale of the forestry harvest, and it gives me—</text>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001253">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001254">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001255">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001256">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order! Member for MacKillop, you are warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001257">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  —great cause for optimism about this process and great cause for optimism about the future of the forestry industry in South Australia and in the South-East in particular. There was a time when the Liberal Party in South Australia actually thought that private investment was a good thing, but that has now apparently ended.</text>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001258">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120215cd3681a9653144b890001259">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>