<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="82" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mary MacKillop Rail Bridge</name>
      <text id="20120214f80faedf34e24dd290001069">
        <heading>MARY MACKILLOP RAIL BRIDGE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>MARY MACKILLOP RAIL BRIDGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-14T15:34:00" />
        <text id="20120214f80faedf34e24dd290001070">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-14T15:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (15:34): </by> Supplementary, Madam Speaker: can the minister assure the house that his department had advised this corporation that an application had been lodged some weeks ago for the passage of the <term>Endeavour</term> through the bridge today, and, indeed, for it to leave in about a week's time? Had notification of that gone from your department to the relevant authority?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>MARY MACKILLOP RAIL BRIDGE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-14T15:35:00" />
        <text id="20120214f80faedf34e24dd290001071">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-14T15:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (15:35): </by> It is a nice try, but I am advised that the issue is not that at all. The issue was that the transfer was not made as it should have been from Mile End to our department. Now, as I have told you, our chief executive has already spoken to their chief executive to find out why that did not occur. One of the disadvantages on this side is that you actually have to deal with the facts, whereas the opposition can simply go out and make up a story. Now, what I am going to do—</text>
        <text id="20120214f80faedf34e24dd290001072">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214f80faedf34e24dd290001073">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214f80faedf34e24dd290001074">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  As soon as we can ascertain why that capacity was not transferred as it should have been and always has been in the past, we will advise you; we will give you the facts and not postulations.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>