<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="82" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>SA Lotteries</name>
      <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000974">
        <heading>SA LOTTERIES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>SA LOTTERIES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-14T15:17:00" />
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000975">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-14T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (15:17):</by>  My question is again to the Premier. Following the swings against Labor in last weekend's by-elections, will the Premier now reverse his decision to sell the state Lotteries Commission?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>SA LOTTERIES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-02-14T15:17:00" />
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000976">
          <timeStamp time="2012-02-14T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (15:17):</by>  These were not matters that were raised with us at the door. If you had participated in the state by-elections, you would have realised that the concerns—</text>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000977">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000978">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order! Leader of the Opposition, you are warned for the second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000979">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Madam Speaker, I am having trouble understanding what the anxiety level of those opposite—in particular the Leader of the Opposition—is about these by-elections. Why were they running away from these contests? What was behind that? What is the explanation for that? Is it because it may have revealed something about the inadequacies of that side of the chamber? Would it have exposed—</text>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000980">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000981">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Member for Unley!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000982">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Or, Madam Speaker, when they—</text>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000983">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000984">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000985">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —resolved upon a strategy, which is apparently not to run a candidate, were there other elements within their party that decided that was the wrong strategy and decided to run a candidate?</text>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000986">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000987">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000988">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Did we just see being revealed the internal divisions within the Liberal Party? Madam Speaker, I must say—</text>
        <text id="20120214032ea0083fd347df80000989">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>