<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="82" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Spending</name>
      <text id="20120214a817b6fdefe243a590000501">
        <heading>GOVERNMENT SPENDING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>GOVERNMENT SPENDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20120214a817b6fdefe243a590000502">In reply to <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (7 October 2010) (Estimates Committee A).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>GOVERNMENT SPENDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20120214a817b6fdefe243a590000503">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development): </by> I have been advised of the following:</text>
        <text id="20120214a817b6fdefe243a590000504">The variation between the $7.1 million budgeted net result for 2009-10 and the $7.6 million actual net result for 2009-10 mainly reflects higher than previously estimated depreciation expense associated with the Electronic Cabinet Online System, and higher employee costs as a result of the Cabinet Submission Release Rule from a 20 year embargo on documents to a 10 year embargo on documents.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>