<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2012-02-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="82" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Employees</name>
      <page num="21" />
      <text id="20120214c361354621654f24b0000487">
        <heading>PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20120214c361354621654f24b0000488">In reply to <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (7 October 2010) (Estimates Committee A).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-02-14">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20120214c361354621654f24b0000489">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development): </by> I have been advised of the following:</text>
        <text id="20120214c361354621654f24b0000490">Employee benefits for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet were $7.723 million higher in 2009-10 compared with 2008-09 reflecting:</text>
        <text id="20120214c361354621654f24b0000491">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">Termination payments in 2009-10 made as part of the 2009-10 TVSP Scheme;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20120214c361354621654f24b0000492">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">A higher revaluation expense for long service leave liability in 2009 10 reflecting variations in the underlying actuarial parameters used to calculate the provision; and</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20120214c361354621654f24b0000493">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">Higher wage expenses in 2009-10 compared with 2008-09 reflecting the impact of the Wages Parity (Salaried) Enterprise Agreement 2010.</item>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>