<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-12-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6217" />
  <endPage num="6298" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
      <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000708">
        <heading>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-12-01">
            <name>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-12-01T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000709">
          <timeStamp time="2011-12-01T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:39):</by>  My question is again to the Premier. How can South Australians be expected to work together responding to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan when South Australian federal Labor MPs are not in support of a High Court challenge on the plan as proposed by the Premier and when the Premier is clearly not in support of the plan as proposed by federal Labor?</text>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000710">The Premier told the media on Monday, 'There is a strong basis for a united SA position on the plan' yet, immediately upon the release of the draft plan, he flagged challenging the federal Labor government in the High Court and insisted that a minimum of 4,000 gigalitres was the only acceptable amount.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-12-01">
            <name>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-12-01T14:40:00" />
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000711">
          <timeStamp time="2011-12-01T14:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Minister for State Development) (14:40):</by>  There are so many of the recited facts there that are inaccurate, but can I just perhaps—</text>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000712">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000713">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000714">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  No, I didn't. What I said is that I would not rule out a challenge to the High Court. If you read the ministerial statement, we assert our rights assertively. If we do not have a plan which is adequate, we will pursue our legal rights. I have set out in the—</text>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000715">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000716">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order! Member for Bragg, you are warned for the second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000717">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —ministerial statement the basis—</text>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000718">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000719">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000720">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —for our claim, the basis for our constitutional claim, that is, that we as a state are one of a series of equals—</text>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000721">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000722">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000723">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —and we have rights in relation to inter-boundary rivers. That is the nature of the claim that we will be making, and it fits precisely with what we have always said about the nature of our rights in relation to other states, not merely in relation to the commonwealth, but in relation to other states. We believe that the commonwealth has an obligation in relation to protecting those rights and we believe that other states have an obligation to respect our rights. That is the nature of our claim. Can I say this fundamentally: while I am a member of the Labor Party, the Premier of South Australia, I will always put South Australia first.</text>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000724">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20111201f8baa4a711b7498db0000725">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>