<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-11-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6143" />
  <endPage num="6219" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Spotless Contract</name>
      <text id="2011112400ebad51e35d46f7a0000648">
        <heading>SPOTLESS CONTRACT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-11-24">
            <name>SPOTLESS CONTRACT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-11-24T14:46:00" />
        <text id="2011112400ebad51e35d46f7a0000649">
          <timeStamp time="2011-11-24T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:46):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Transport. Can the minister confirm the concerns that have been raised within government in relation to Spotless overcharging on its contract by more than $500,000 a year and what action the government has taken in relation to any overcharging?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-11-24">
            <name>SPOTLESS CONTRACT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-11-24T14:46:00" />
        <text id="2011112400ebad51e35d46f7a0000650">
          <timeStamp time="2011-11-24T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:46):</by>  I can confirm that officers of the government have raised concerns with Spotless, including that and others, because they are rigorous managers of the public purse. They manage the contract in the interest of the taxpayer, and they manage it with great rigour. What I would say again to the member for Davenport is that everything I have told him is the best advice that I can get from the department.</text>
        <text id="2011112400ebad51e35d46f7a0000651">I am happy for him to have as long as he wants with the officer responsible for this, and he can ask all of those questions. But I will tell you this: while I respect the member for Davenport as being one of the members of the opposition who has more than usual acuity for that group, I am not going to substitute his view for the view of the responsible officer. I invite him to have a briefing and we will be completely open about all those aspects. What I will say is this: I am absolutely satisfied that our officers are managing this contract with great rigour in the interests of the taxpayer. I would be more concerned if they never found fault with Spotless, because I would be worried if they were doing their job.</text>
        <text id="2011112400ebad51e35d46f7a0000652">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011112400ebad51e35d46f7a0000653">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>