<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-11-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6059" />
  <endPage num="6145" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <text id="201111233dc8285e83c94842a0000308">
      <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="201111233dc8285e83c94842a0000309">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-11-23">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201111233dc8285e83c94842a0000310">In reply to <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett)</by> (16 September 2010).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Ageing</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-11-23">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201111233dc8285e83c94842a0000311">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts):</by>  I refer to my Ministerial Statement on this subject on 18 June 2009. In this statement I advised that the age and nature of information thought to be on the lost USB device meant there was limited value to bidders or other parties having this information.</text>
        <text id="201111233dc8285e83c94842a0000312">Further, a thorough investigation was conducted regarding the missing USB device. The loss of the data was subject to an inquiry by the Government Investigation Unit and probity assessment by the Crown Solicitor's Office.</text>
        <text id="201111233dc8285e83c94842a0000313">It was determined that the material believed to have been on the USB device was unlikely to be a significant risk; and that the loss was not considered malicious.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>