<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-09-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5133" />
  <endPage num="5213" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Solar Feed-In Scheme</name>
      <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000473">
        <heading>SOLAR FEED-IN SCHEME</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-09-28">
            <name>SOLAR FEED-IN SCHEME</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-09-28T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000474">
          <timeStamp time="2011-09-28T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:46):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Energy. Given the dramatic uptake of the government's solar feed-in scheme before this week's cut-off, has the government modelled what cost of living increases will accrue through increased household electricity prices as a result of the feed-in scheme? If so, what are the results of that modelling and, if not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Northern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-09-28">
            <name>SOLAR FEED-IN SCHEME</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-09-28T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000475">
          <timeStamp time="2011-09-28T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Energy, Minister for the Northern Suburbs) (14:46):</by>  We have, but unfortunately I don't have the figures at my fingertips.</text>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000476">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000477">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000478">
          <by role="member" id="619">An honourable member:</by>  World's best energy minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000479">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Thanks for that.</text>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000480">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000481">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Yes, I've expanded since then—additional responsibilities. From memory, deputy leader, I think we put the increase at around 8 per cent of electricity bills, but I will look at that. However, one of the things we did establish (and one of the things that was a concern for me initially) was that that additional cost impost was falling on low income households and that the uptake was strongest in the eastern suburbs of Adelaide, so the poorer suburbs and poorer regions of South Australia would be subsidising the wealthier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000482">
          <by role="member" id="619">An honourable member:</by>  Springfield.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110928d1c8829d68f746d780000483">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Yes, Springfield being one of those and me a potential beneficiary. One electricity company had done some modelling that indicated that on a national basis this was the case. We did an analysis of postcodes, which actually indicated that the uptake of panels was in the mortgage belt, particularly the newer suburbs to the north and south of Adelaide, and then the next ranking of older suburbs in which a large proportion of individuals were still paying their mortgage, so this 8 per cent—and I will get back to the deputy leader with a firm figure—is actually falling not on the mortgage belt or low income earners; it is actually being picked up by wealthier residents in South Australia. I will return with a specific figure. We do know what it is, but I just don't have that particular figure at my disposal.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>