<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-09-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4801" />
  <endPage num="4886" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Ministerial Statement</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cossey Review</name>
      <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000611">
        <heading>COSSEY REVIEW</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Workers Rehabilitation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-09-13T15:13:00" />
        <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000612">
          <timeStamp time="2011-09-13T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Treasurer, Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education, Minister for Workers Rehabilitation) (15:13):</by>  I seek leave to make a ministerial statement.</text>
        <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000613">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000614">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  In June this year, the then Minister for Industrial Relations tabled the review of the Impact of the Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation (Scheme Review) Amendment Act 2008.</text>
        <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000615">Mr Bill Cossey was assigned the task of reviewing the 2008 amendments to the Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Scheme as required by statute earlier this year. The review assessed the impact of the 2008 amendments based on all reasonable available information but, in my view, did not find significant improvements in the scheme that should be pursued at this time based on that it was not yet possible to draw firm conclusions about the impact of the 2008 legislative changes.</text>
        <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000616">The review makes it clear that it is too early to measure the impacts of the 2008 changes, let alone base substantial further reform on its early findings. It is for this reason that, in developing the government's response to the Cossey Review, recent judgements, including Campbell and Yaghoubi, Davey and Mericka, as well as other reform proposals, will be taken into consideration.</text>
        <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000617">I continue to work on the appropriate response to the Cossey Review in this context and I will work closely with employee and employer representatives, the WorkCover CEO and board, and other interested parties.</text>
        <text id="20110913ab30d05cb6874031a0000618">It is my strong belief that the South Australian WorkCover scheme must focus on return to work. There is much work ahead in improving return to work rates. Increasing return to work rates is the key to the best results for injured workers, employers and the financial sustainability of the scheme. Any response to the review and other matters will be contingent on actuarial assessment to uphold the government's commitment to give support for injured workers to work while creating a more affordable and sustainable scheme for employers. This will be balanced against the potential impact of any changes in the average levy rate and the unfunded liability and any consequential impact on the state's financial position.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>