<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-07-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4577" />
  <endPage num="4641" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000695">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-26">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-26T15:44:00" />
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000696">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-26T15:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (15:44):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Is it an acceptable standard for a minister to not read a government document because he cannot trust himself not to reveal its content, as stated by the new Minister for State/Local Government Relations, and what process has been put in place regarding this minister's access to confidential cabinet submissions?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-26">
            <name>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-26T15:45:00" />
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000697">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-26T15:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (15:45):</by>  I think I announced on Friday that it was my clear view, and that of the Attorney-General, that the Burnside documents, having been suppressed by the Supreme Court—which, by the way, is a higher court than the ones that you are involved in—</text>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000698">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000699">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  Oh you did? Okay.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000700">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  So you can apologise now if you like.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000701">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000702">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  I apologise; it was uncalled for—that, in fact, the Burnside report should go to the police commissioner and should go to the Director of Public Prosecutions and go to the Anti-Corruption Branch.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000703">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker—standing order 98: as informative as this may be, it has got nothing to do with the question. Despite the ludicrousness of this circumstance, it is a serious question. We have a minister of the Crown—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000704">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Thank you—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000705">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  —who is not game to read confidential information.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000706">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Thank you. I understand your question is serious; but I don't uphold your point of order because the Premier is answering it, and I think it is relevant—I see it as relevant. </text>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000707">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="9">The Hon. P.F. Conlon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000708">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000709">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  I am trying to put this into some intellectual framework for the Leader of the Opposition. Drawing upon 29 years of experience as a justice of the peace, it seems to me that it is very important for a minister to take legal advice. Of course, the Solicitor-General has given ministers and the minister's predecessor legal advice. The Supreme Court had suppressed the document so it is appropriate for the police commissioner—the Solicitor-General who, I understand, said that there was no likelihood of prosecutions—</text>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000710">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000711">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order, member for Unley!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000712">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  —but I am quite relaxed about the fact that the police commissioner, the Anti-Corruption Branch and the Director of Public Prosecutions are getting a copy. But I do think it is important for the minister to abide by Supreme Court decisions.</text>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000713">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110726ed7e5f02c0c0400aa0000714">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>