<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-07-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4447" />
  <endPage num="4521" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Adelaide Convention Centre</name>
      <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000718">
        <heading>ADELAIDE CONVENTION CENTRE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="538" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs GERAGHTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Torrens</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-06">
            <name>ADELAIDE CONVENTION CENTRE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-06T15:57:00" />
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000719">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-06T15:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="538">Mrs GERAGHTY (Torrens) (15:57):</by>  My question is to the Deputy Premier, the Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide. Can the minister inform the house about the release of the designs for Adelaide's redeveloped Convention Centre?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Food Marketing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-06">
            <name>ADELAIDE CONVENTION CENTRE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-07-06T15:57:00" />
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000720">
          <timeStamp time="2011-07-06T15:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Food Marketing) (15:57):</by>  I thank the honourable member very much for her question. Yes, last week the government was able to unveil the plans for the new Convention Centre, which is a $350 million redevelopment in two stages. The first stage involves the construction of a new building to the west of the existing building, which will come into contact at its western margin with the Morphett Street Bridge, and then subsequently there will be a second phase of the development when the existing plenary building is demolished and a new building replaces it.</text>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000721">These developments are a crucial element of the government's vision for rejuvenating the riverbank precinct and will obviously become part of the postcard landscape of the city of Adelaide for years to come. The plans not only include very significant and impressive new buildings but will also provide for different ways of access through and about the river precinct—that is, through North Terrace to the riverbank itself, a new frontage onto the Morphett Street Bridge so that there will be now a—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000722">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker. I seek your ruling on the question of whether the minister is addressing a matter before a committee of the parliament. The Public Works Committee has heard evidence this morning on the project to which the minister is referring. The committee is yet to report and complete its work, and I seek your guidance on whether the question is out of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000723">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Minister, you would be aware of the implications of that question. I would hope that your response would be—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000724">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Yes, Madam Speaker, you might be able to assist me because I have a question which you might be able to assist me with. My understanding is that if the committee has basically discharged its function, it is perfectly reasonable for me to go down this path. I do understand that, at some point in the committee meeting, certain members put their hands over their faces and said, 'We're not here, we're not here, we're not here,' and a vote was taken whilst they were standing there pretending not to be there. Does the fact that they say they are not there render them not there? That is actually a relevant question, because my understanding is if you are in the room—</text>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000725">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000726">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000727">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —and the <term>Hansard—</term></text>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000728">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000729">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000730">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Madam Speaker, it is a bit like, 'There's no-one here but us chickens.' If you are actually on the <term>Hansard </term>saying, 'Hey, I'm not here, I'm not here!'—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000731">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000732">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000733">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  I am seeking your decision on the point of order I have raised. It is not a question for debate. It is a question of the Public Works Committee having to report to the house on the project, which has not yet occurred, so it is before the committee.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4495" />
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000734">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> I understand there was some controversy about that meeting this morning. I am not sure of the full circumstances of it; I have heard varying rumours. I think until that matter is clarified for me we will defer that question until a later time. I will go to the next question. Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000735">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  Point of order, Madam Chair: I think the <term>Hansard</term> will show that the Deputy Premier claims to have quoted from the <term>Hansard</term>, which is yet not public, and is privileged to the committee. I would ask you to look at that during the break and give a ruling.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000736">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Thank you, member for Davenport. I will look at the <term>Hansard, </term>but I don't think—I didn't hear the Attorney-General say—</text>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000737">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110706bbc782eaf112439ba0000738">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I have said that I will look further into this matter, because I understand there are some issues relating to the committee meeting this morning, and I will follow them up and report back to the house. Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>