<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-06-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4363" />
  <endPage num="4450" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Funding</name>
      <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000658">
        <heading>POLICE FUNDING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-23">
            <name>POLICE FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-23T15:02:00" />
        <page num="4405" />
        <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000659">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-23T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (15:02):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Given the high costs of continuing legal challenges to the anti-bikie laws, has the government had any discussions with SAPOL as to whether the limited resources available to government would be better spent on better resourcing our police rather than fighting court cases?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Food Marketing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-23">
            <name>POLICE FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-23T15:02:00" />
        <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000660">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-23T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Food Marketing) (15:02):</by>  I thank the honourable member very much for her question. I would like to read a statement to the parliament which I think really answers the question:</text>
        <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000661">
          <inserted>It's about time we asked ourselves a question: is it better to waste money in futile High Court challenges or is it better to get in, back into the parliament, make laws that are well within our...constitutional power and get on and fight organised crime?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. Foley</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000662">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. Foley:</by>  Who said that?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000663">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Stephen Wade; he said it today!</text>
        <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000664">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011062334f114ddf9e6499bb0000665">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>