<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-06-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3999" />
  <endPage num="4087" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Independent Commission Against Corruption</name>
      <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000906">
        <heading>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-08">
            <name>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-08T14:58:00" />
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000907">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:58):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Can the Attorney-General explain how he can possibly deliver an effective independent commission against corruption when the government has committed only 10 per cent of the amount that it previously claimed, on numerous occasions, an ICAC would cost?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Food Marketing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-08">
            <name>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-08T14:58:00" />
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000908">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Food Marketing) (14:58):</by>  I thank the honourable member for the question. The story about this is a very simple one, and I will explain it again because it obviously has not been settling in very well. The story is this: we announced last year that we were going to examine the question of public integrity in South Australia. We did an internal review, asked various agencies what they thought might be useful, and we prepared a discussion paper. The discussion paper was put out in November. The discussion paper was—</text>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000909">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000910">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Leader of the Opposition, listen to the answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000911">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  The discussion paper was put out in November of last year. The discussion paper proposed a model. The model in the discussion paper was subject to a rough guesstimate at a costing at that time, and that is, for the time being, where the forward estimates place the cost.</text>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000912">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000913">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I have not said anything of the sort, and—</text>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000914">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000915">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000916">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —and—</text>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000917">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000918">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Leader of the Opposition can debate in a grievance if she wants to afterwards but not across the floor now.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000919">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU: </by> As I was saying, what we are doing now is going through all of the responses we have received to that discussion paper. We are looking at those responses, examining them against the model and considering any recommendations made—</text>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000920">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000921">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Have you finished, Attorney?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000922">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU: </by> They are not interested.</text>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000923">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000924">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I warn the Leader of the Opposition.</text>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000925">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608ca8a36204371466580000926">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for MacKillop and the Minister for Transport, be quiet. The member for Kavel.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>