<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-06-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3999" />
  <endPage num="4087" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Narrung Bund</name>
      <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000872">
        <heading>NARRUNG BUND</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-08">
            <name>NARRUNG BUND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-08T14:53:00" />
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000873">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:53):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Water. Can the minister explain why his federal counterpart, Tony Burke, only received last Friday the relevant documentation from the South Australian government necessary for the removal of the Narrung bund, as Tony Burke revealed on Adelaide radio this morning? Since September last year, the minister has been telling the public that the government has the removal plans in place, and he also told the house on 10 February this year, in relation to this matter, and I quote:</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000874">
          <inserted>We expect the matter to be resolved fairly quickly and, even as we speak, we have representatives over there talking with their Commonwealth counterparts...</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="4045" />
        <text continued="true" id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000875">It is now June.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Conservation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-08">
            <name>NARRUNG BUND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-08T14:54:00" />
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000876">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water) (14:54):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I did not hear my friend and colleague Tony Burke on the wireless this morning—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000877">
          <by role="member" id="619">An honourable member:</by>  It's called the radio these days.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000878">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  —the radio—but I think that it has been common knowledge for some time. I think that Tony has said this previously, and I presume that he said it again this morning—it is something that I have said as well—that it has been a pretty tortuous process with respect to the level of bureaucratic involvement with regard to getting a decision made. I stand by what I have previously said. I think we have probably sent numerous proposals through to the federal government department on issues relating to the removal of the Clayton regulator, as we did with the Narrung regulator. As I understand it, Tony, like I, is sick and tired of—</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000879">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000880">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000881">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  —the inability, if you like—and I understand—</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000882">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000883">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000884">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  I understand that it is very important that due diligence is undertaken when we are spending other people's money, particularly taxpayers' money, but the delay has been totally unacceptable, and—</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000885">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000886">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000887">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000888">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  You asked me a question; you're not interested in the answer, really.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000889">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  Yes, we are.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000890">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  No, you're not. You're not; otherwise you would just shut up.</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000891">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000892">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  Sorry, Madam Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000893">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000894">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000895">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Order, member for MacKillop!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000896">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  What, 'shut up'? Is that a swear word, is it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000897">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000898">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  I'll check. No, it's not. Tony, like I, has said it was unacceptable. He or his department received another series of documents on Friday in relation to the conditions, and South Australia's conditions that we say ought to be involved, and what the commonwealth requires regarding the removal of that bund. I understand that he will be considering that soon. That has been the trouble with this process—mostly from a bureaucratic perspective—it is always 'soon'. But, at the expense of being—</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000899">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000900">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000901">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000902">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  This deputy leader insists on standing orders and is interjecting again. It is out of order.</text>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000903">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4046" />
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000904">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The deputy leader is aware of the standing orders and he needs to be very careful. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110608e86818ff27dc43aba0000905">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  He is certainly aware of them, Madam Speaker, but it is quite clear that he does not observe them. I would go as far as to say that the final decision-making process of the commonwealth government is imminent.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>