<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-06-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3999" />
  <endPage num="4087" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Service Cuts</name>
      <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000833">
        <heading>PUBLIC SERVICE CUTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-08">
            <name>PUBLIC SERVICE CUTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-08T14:46:00" />
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000834">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:46):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. What is the latest advice to the Treasurer on how many of the 3,750 jobs targeted in last year's budget have now been cut?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-06-08">
            <name>PUBLIC SERVICE CUTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-06-08T14:47:00" />
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000835">
          <timeStamp time="2011-06-08T14:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Treasurer, Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education) (14:47):</by>  I do not have the exact number on hand, but it is important to remember that the 3,700-odd jobs that were announced in last year's budget would be reduced partly through TVSPs—through separation packages—and partly through natural attrition. So, as people resign from the public sector, they would not be replaced.</text>
        <page num="4043" />
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000836">I presume what the member for Davenport is getting at is how we are going in terms of people who take up the TVSPs. It is important to remember that the packages have only been on offer since early this year—I think February or March—so it is still early days in terms of establishing how successful those packages have been in attracting people to take them up and to separate from the public sector. Certainly the early data is quite good. I am certainly happy with where it is at, and the advice that I am getting from Treasury is that the numbers are quite good in terms of—</text>
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000837">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000838">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000839">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  —the government meeting its target of a 3,700-odd reduction in TVSPs.</text>
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000840">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011060884e2892df8a84ea2a0000841">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>