<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-05-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3699" />
  <endPage num="3770" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Easling, Mr T.</name>
      <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000414">
        <heading>EASLING, MR T.</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-05-18">
            <name>EASLING, MR T.</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-05-18T14:35:00" />
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000415">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-18T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:35):</by>  My question is again to the Attorney-General. Will the Attorney-General explain why the government does not comment on allegations made against defamation victim Tom Easling, a matter which is not before the courts, but the government does comment on allegations against alleged assault victim, the Minister for Police, a matter which is before the courts?</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000416">Yesterday, the Attorney-General, in answer to a question directed to the Minister for Families and Communities about defamation victim Tom Easling, stated, 'It is inappropriate in those circumstances to be examining this matter.'</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000417">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000418">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Food Marketing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-05-18T14:35:00" />
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000419">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-18T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Food Marketing) (14:35):</by>  I thank the honourable member for the question. As the honourable member would be aware, we understand that there are matters before the court, or shortly to be before the court, in relation to proceedings which were issued—</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000420">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000421">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! You have asked the question.</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000422">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000423">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Well, the honourable member has information that I don't. My understanding is—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mrs Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000424">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs Redmond:</by>  What, you're saying there is no application before the court?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="3728" />
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000425">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000426">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  No. Can I, Madam Speaker, just answer the question please?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000427">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000428">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  The point of it is basically this: when you issue proceedings and judgement is signed, and somebody says, 'Look, I am challenging the signing of a judgement,' that matter is before the court, because the–</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000429">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000430">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Let me explain—because the issue about why and how that matter came into being is a matter which will be agitated before the court—</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000431">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000432">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000433">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I understood the statement that the honourable member made yesterday was to the effect that she had given instructions for that to occur.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000434">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni:</by>  What she says and what she does are two different things, John; you know that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000435">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000436">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I'm not even going to—</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000437">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000438">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000439">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000440">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, members on my left!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000441">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  If you want me to—</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000442">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000443">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Member for MacKillop, you're warned!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000444">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  No; actually, I was thinking of all the people in this chamber to interject with that who better but the member for Unley? As far as I am concerned, I intend to say nothing about any proceedings that are in the court, or being foreshadowed to be before the courts, and, as I said yesterday, the statement that was given to the house yesterday, which was before question time, was to the effect that instructions had been issued to solicitors for the honourable member. Now—</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000445">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000446">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! You have asked your question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000447">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  As far as I'm concerned that's where the matter finishes.</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000448">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000449">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000450">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105187d95520bae0e4e2cb0000451">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Torrens.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>