<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-05-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3633" />
  <endPage num="3701" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000831">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Leader of the Opposition, Qualifications</name>
      <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000832">
        <heading>LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, QUALIFICATIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="speech">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-05-17T15:39:00" />
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000833">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-17T15:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (15:39):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000834">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000835">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  I just want to put quickly on the record a response to some matters that were raised by the government this afternoon in relation to my qualification as a lawyer. A number of disparaging remarks were made across the chamber about whether or not I am legitimately practising as a lawyer. I do not practise and have not held a practising certificate since 2002 when I came into this place, and that is a deliberate choice on my part, but in terms of my qualifications, I want to put on the record that, when I graduated from high school, my family was not rich enough for me to go to university—and it was before Gough Whitlam abolished university fees.</text>
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000836">The alternative route for me to become a lawyer was to study with a group called the Barristers Admissions Board in Sydney, a course taken by many eminent lawyers—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. Atkinson</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000837">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. Atkinson:</by>  Attorney-General Rowe in the Playford government—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000838">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> The member for Croydon!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="3680" />
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000839">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  —such as McHugh, who was on the High Court. I qualified under that path, being admitted to practise in 1977 in New South Wales and then subsequently in about 1984 in this state. I just want to make it clear on the record that there can be no suggestion that I do not hold a valid qualification, that I practised in this state and other places as a properly qualified and admitted lawyer, and that it is improper for the government and ministers thereof to accuse me in any way of not being qualified to practise the law should I choose to do so.</text>
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000840">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110517c9e22c6e37f7436b90000841">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Croydon.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>