<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-05-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3633" />
  <endPage num="3701" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Minister, Assault</name>
      <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000611">
        <heading>POLICE MINISTER, ASSAULT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-05-17">
            <name>POLICE MINISTER, ASSAULT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-05-17T15:01:00" />
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000612">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-17T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (15:01):</by>  My question is again to the Attorney-General. Was the Minister for Police correct to claim that a case is unlikely to be won because there are three defence witnesses against one prosecution witness? The police minister told radio on 13 May:</text>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000613">
          <inserted>The police made it very clear to me that given there were three individuals in the toilet, of which one assaulted me and the other two had to restrain the person involved, the likelihood of a prosecution was slim because it was three people's version of events against one.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Food Marketing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-05-17">
            <name>POLICE MINISTER, ASSAULT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-05-17T15:02:00" />
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000614">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-17T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide, Minister for Tourism, Minister for Food Marketing) (15:02):</by>  I think this is again a bit like the last question; it's a bit like how long is a piece of string? I think it is—</text>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000615">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000616">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000617">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  The honourable Leader of the Opposition is, when not here, a lawyer, and knows—</text>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000618">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="3670" />
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000619">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Okay, she is always the Leader of the Opposition, but she also has a law degree—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mrs Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000620">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs Redmond:</by>  No.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000621">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  You don't even have a law degree?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mrs Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000622">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs Redmond:</by>  No.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000623">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Never had a law degree?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mrs Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000624">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs Redmond:</by>  No.</text>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000625">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000626">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Okay, fair enough. Very technical; you see, she is a lawyer. A lawyer in name, if not in qualifications. I think I have answered the question.</text>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000627">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105170471aa9727fd4ea0b0000628">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>