<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-05-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3487" />
  <endPage num="3564" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Radiation Protection and Control (Licences and Registration) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000146">
        <heading>RADIATION PROTECTION AND CONTROL (LICENCES AND REGISTRATION) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000147">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Environment and Conservation</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Water</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2011-05-04T12:01:00" />
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000148">
            <timeStamp time="2011-05-04T12:01:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water) (12:01):</by>  Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Radiation Protection and Control Act 1982. Read a first time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000149">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Environment and Conservation</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Water</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2011-05-04T12:01:00" />
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000150">
            <timeStamp time="2011-05-04T12:01:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water) (12:01):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000151">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000152">Radioactive substances are widely used in science, industry and medicine. In the medical field, for example, radioactive substances are used by licensed radiation therapists and medical physicists for treating certain cancers. Strict procedures are followed by these clinicians to protect themselves and patients from harm. In industry, highly radioactive substances are used for industrial radiography. It is crucial that procedures must be put in place to ensure the safety of the users of the radioactive substances as well as people who may be in the vicinity of the work.</text>
          <page num="3498" />
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000153">The Radiation Protection and Control Act 1982 (RPC act) serves to ensure that the health and safety of South Australians who may be affected by radioactive substances are protected and that those who use radioactive substances or radiation equipment are properly trained and licensed.</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000154">The purpose of this Bill is to remove paragraph (a) from section 28(2) and paragraph (a) from section 29(3) of the RPC act. Without the removal of these paragraphs, these provisions would have unintended consequences on the enactment of the Statutes Amendment (Budget 2010) Act 2010<term></term>(the budget act) that have the potential to expose persons involved in the use of radioactive substances to risk. Without this amendment, changes made to the RPC act by the budget act may result in unintended persons being able to lawfully handle radioactive substances.</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000155">Section 28(2)(a) of the RPC act provides that the requirement for a licence to use or handle radioactive substances does not apply 'to the use or handling of radioactive substances in the course of operations authorised under provisions of the RPC act'. Currently, the only provision of the RPC act which authorises operations is section 24—Licence to mine or mill radioactive ores. Section 28(2)(a) therefore only applies to operations authorised under section 24. However, when amendments are made to the RPC act by the budget act, a licence to possess a radiation source and a facilities licence will also be introduced. Individuals involved in these operations would arguably be exempted from the requirement of a licence by virtue of section 28(2)(a).</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000156">To remedy the situation, paragraph (a) of section 28(2) needs to be deleted. A provision will instead be made in the regulations to prescribe persons using or handling radioactive substances in the course of operations authorised by a licence under section 24 of the RPC act as persons of a prescribed class.</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000157">Section 29(3)(a) provides for the requirement to register premises in which an unsealed radioactive substance is kept or handled. It is thought that, because of the new licences provided for under the Budget Act, there is a risk that section 29(3)(a) could be interpreted to allow new premises not to be registered. This could lead to a situation where the records for the location of dangerous radioactive substances are incomplete. The resulting radiation risk would not be as significant as that associated with a licence to use or handle radiation substances.</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000158">In this case, conditions of a licence to possess a radiation source would still apply to these premises, and therefore radiation management plans and radiation waste management plans would still apply. However, when premises are registered with the authority, an inspection is undertaken to ensure that the premises meet the requirements of the regulations and this may not take place.</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000159">To remedy this situation, paragraph (a) of section 29(3) needs to be deleted. A provision would instead be made in the regulations to prescribe premises in which unsealed radioactive substances are kept or handled in the course of operations authorised by a licence under section 24 of the RPC Act as a premises of a prescribed class.</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000160">I commend the bill to members, and I seek leave to have the explanation of clauses inserted in<term> Hansard </term>without my reading it.</text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000161">Leave granted.</text>
          <bookmark>Explanation of Clauses</bookmark>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000162">
            <inserted>
              <subheading>Explanation of Clauses</subheading>
            </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000163">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 1—Preliminary</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000164">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Short title</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000165">
            <item>
              <inserted>2—Commencement</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000166">
            <item>
              <inserted>3—Amendment provisions</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000167">
            <inserted>These clauses are formal.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000168">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 2—Amendment of <term>Radiation Protection and Control Act 1982</term></inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000169">
            <item>
              <inserted>4—Amendment of section 28—Licence to use or handle radioactive substances</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000170">
            <inserted>This clause removes paragraph (a) from section 28(2). Paragraph (a) exempts a natural person from the requirement to be licensed under the section if the use or handling of a radioactive substance is in the course of operations authorised under another provision of the principal Act. The amendment is necessary in light of the <term>Statutes Amendment (Budget 2010) Act 2010</term> which establishes new licences in circumstances in which a natural person may still be required to be licensed under section 28. It is anticipated that the activities in connection with which a licence under section 28 will not be required will be prescribed in the regulations under this amended provision, thus the current status quo for existing licences will be retained.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000171">
            <inserted>5—Amendment of section 29—Registration of premises in which unsealed radioactive substances are handled or kept</inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="3499" />
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000172">
            <inserted>This clause removes paragraph (a) from section 29(3). Paragraph (a) exempts premises from the requirement to be registered under the section if the keeping or handling of radioactive substances is in the course of operations authorised under another provision of the principal Act. This is a similar amendment to that in clause 4 and is similarly consequential on amendments to the principal Act effected by the <term>Statutes Amendment (Budget 2010) Act 2010</term>.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2011050474d87ff0490848df80000173">Debate adjourned on motion of Mr Pederick.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>