<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-05-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3487" />
  <endPage num="3564" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000761">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-05-04">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-05-04T14:35:00" />
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000762">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-04T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:35):</by>  Can I ask another question of the Minister for Health? Is the Minister for Health seriously suggesting that the Macquarie Bank is misleading potential investors when the government claims that a new Royal Adelaide Hospital won't cost $2.73 billion? Can he advise the house which figure in the Macquarie document is wrong?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-05-04">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-05-04T14:34:00" />
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000763">
          <timeStamp time="2011-05-04T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:34):</by>  I do not have a copy of the Macquarie document. I am—</text>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000764">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000765">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000766">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  Unlike Jim Katsaros, I am not a subscriber to the high wealth group who are provided with this document. I understand it has been alleged—</text>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000767">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000768">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000769">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  I understand—</text>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000770">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000771">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  Yes; has David Ridgway got a copy? That will be the interesting thing. I understand that it is alleged that a copy has been sent to my office. I have asked my office; they have not seen it. If it were to arrive, I would do what is appropriate and send it back to Macquarie Bank, because it is illegally transferred to others than the people on the list. They had to sign confidentiality agreements. But I do hope that the media gets to ask Mr Katsaros whether he is responsible for the leaking of this document. I would be interested to hear what he has to say. I was interested to hear what he had to say during the election. I was interested to see that his vote was less than 1 per cent but, be that as it may—</text>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000772">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000773">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000774">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  —the contract will be signed and then all of the information will be put into the public domain, and everybody will have an understanding of what the construction costs are and what all the other costs associated with the hospital are, and we will be able to do some comparisons with other like buildings which are done by normal procurement processes. It is unfair and unreasonable to compare one type of project that is constructed in a particular way with another without taking into account all of the other costs associated with the second way of procuring a hospital. You cannot just compare the construction costs of a hospital in one case with the construction plus operating costs of it in another. That is wrong in principle and wrong in practice.</text>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000775">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201105042c54d06c7ed64a07b0000776">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>