<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3069" />
  <endPage num="3150" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray River Water Allocations</name>
      <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000653">
        <heading>MURRAY RIVER WATER ALLOCATIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4339" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WHETSTONE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Chaffey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-03-24">
            <name>MURRAY RIVER WATER ALLOCATIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-03-24T14:58:00" />
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000654">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-24T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4339">Mr WHETSTONE (Chaffey) (14:58):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Water. Can the minister advise whether a full entitlement allocation of 1,850 gigalitres to South Australia will guarantee River Murray irrigators 100 per cent water allocation?</text>
        <page num="3111" />
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000655">In recent days, the Murray Darling Basin Authority has indicated that South Australia will start the 2011-12 season with a guaranteed minimum allocation of 1,850 gigalitres. In the past, an allocation of 1,850 gigalitres has meant that irrigators received their full entitlement. Can the minister confirm that he will give River Murray irrigators 100 per cent of entitlement on 1 July 2011?</text>
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000656">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000657">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Minister for Water.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Conservation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-03-24T14:58:00" />
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000658">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-24T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water) (14:58):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. He might have well been at meetings, because he does lob at many of the meetings that I have had in the Riverland, and I appreciate and welcome that. I have previously said—and I think the figure I was using is the 99 per cent chance. And I would remind the opposition—but I think the member for Chaffey is aware of this anyway—that we do have some agreements with other states about when announcements will be made.</text>
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000659">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000660">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  No, we abide by what those agreements are, and we will change agreements through negotiation when it is appropriate to do so.</text>
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000661">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110324ca2d83ab282f4d38a0000662">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA:</by>  No, we will not go over there to a meeting in Canberra without making an appointment, and I will not go over there and give them headlocks. We will do that through the appropriate processes that we as a government will do. Quite frankly, I have already answered that question publicly and will continue to do so. Should we receive (which it is most likely that we will) 1,850 gigalitres, irrigators and, in fact, the users will get their entitlements.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>