<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-03-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2995" />
  <endPage num="3071" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Parliamentary Committees</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Works Committee: RGH Teaching Aged Care and Rehabilitation Facilities Development</name>
      <text id="20110323f5785d083dd9472080000103">
        <heading>PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE: RGH TEACHING AGED CARE AND REHABILITATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4336" kind="speech">
        <name>Mrs VLAHOS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Taylor</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-03-23T11:45:00" />
        <text id="20110323f5785d083dd9472080000104">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-23T11:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4336">Mrs VLAHOS (Taylor) (11:45):</by>  I move:</text>
        <page num="3003" />
        <text id="20110323f5785d083dd9472080000105">
          <inserted>That the 392<sup>nd</sup> report of the committee, entitled RGH Teaching Aged Care and Rehabilitation Facilities Development, be noted.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20110323f5785d083dd9472080000106">Based on the evidence presented to it, and pursuant to section 12C of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1991, the Public Works Committee reports to the parliament that it recommends the proposed public works.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-03-23T11:46:00" />
        <text id="20110323f5785d083dd9472080000107">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-23T11:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite) (11:46):</by>  I rise to support the motion, and I will be extremely brief. This is a very worthwhile project. The only concern raised by the opposition during its passage through the Public Works Committee was the lack of consultation with the community and Mitcham council that had occurred in the early stages of the matter. We needed to be assured that the material we had been given would stand up to public scrutiny. That resulted in a delay of a couple of months while the department was forced to go back and speak to the council. A process has now been put in place as a result of that, and we are happy.</text>
        <text id="20110323f5785d083dd9472080000108">The aim was never to try to replicate the planning processes but simply to make sure that, before a department brings a project to the parliament through the Public Works Committee, it has done the homework and the very basics of consultation. It is a good project, and it has our full support.</text>
        <text id="20110323f5785d083dd9472080000109">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>