<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-03-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2849" />
  <endPage num="2918" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>National Literacy and Numeracy Tests</name>
      <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000764">
        <heading>NATIONAL LITERACY AND NUMERACY TESTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-03-10">
            <name>NATIONAL LITERACY AND NUMERACY TESTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-03-10T15:11:00" />
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000765">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-10T15:11:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (15:11): </by> My question is, again, to the Minister for Education. Why was one public school teacher at St Leonard's who interfered with last year's NAPLAN test sacked while another public school teacher who interfered at Elizabeth Vale was reappointed in a leadership position? The memo that went out to principals and staff at Elizabeth Vale Primary School states:</text>
        <page num="2895" />
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000766">
          <inserted>The teacher was found to have been negligent with regards to one of the allegations and to have behaved inappropriately in regards to two others.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Early Childhood Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Science and Information Economy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-03-10">
            <name>NATIONAL LITERACY AND NUMERACY TESTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-03-10T15:12:00" />
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000767">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-10T15:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Minister for Education, Minister for Early Childhood Development, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (15:12):</by>  The simple answer for the member for Unley is that in one case the circumstances of the misconduct was more egregious. It is quite clear. In one case where the teacher was dismissed, there were deliberate and extensive changes to a number of the answers that were given by the students to the NAPLAN test.</text>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000768">Of course, it was offered by way of exculpation that somehow that was caused by some pressure that the teacher was under, but members need to remember that thousands of other teachers must have been experiencing the same pressure and they did not choose to transgress what are obviously matters of professional conduct. In this particular case, the teacher admitted to carrying out this cheating—</text>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000769">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000770">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000771">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000772">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL: </by> Well, it is as simple as that. That's right. It is as simple as that, that the—</text>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000773">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000774">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110310e31e449d804f454bb0000775">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL: </by> No. We made findings. We investigated both cases. One made an admission, and we made findings about the other matter. The allegations, in fact, were not as serious in nature in relation to the second case concerning NAPLAN tests. Even the allegations were not as serious in nature. We carried out a proper investigation and found that they were proven in one case and not in another case. They were simply different cases which, of course, attracted different penalties.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>