<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-03-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2709" />
  <endPage num="2775" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Marine Parks</name>
      <text id="20110308358d3c103f894df0b0000664">
        <heading>MARINE PARKS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4341" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TRELOAR</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Flinders</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-03-08">
            <name>MARINE PARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-03-08T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20110308358d3c103f894df0b0000665">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-08T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4341">Mr TRELOAR (Flinders) (15:03): </by> My next question is to the Minister for Environment and Conservation. Has the government completed any economic or regional impact modelling to determine the impact of the current marine parks proposal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Conservation</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-03-08">
            <name>MARINE PARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-03-08T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20110308358d3c103f894df0b0000666">
          <timeStamp time="2011-03-08T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water) (15:03):</by>  I thank the member for Flinders for his question and acknowledge his very good representation of the people within the Flinders electorate. There has been a significant amount of debate about the marine parks at the moment. A consultation process is being undertaken. What we are doing, of course, is encouraging—and I would actually encourage the members opposite in turn to encourage their constituents, whether they be commercial fishers, recreational fishers, tourism operators or representatives of the regional communities there, to engage in this process so that the proposed sanctuary zones, in fact, will be those that are determined by the community.</text>
        <text id="20110308358d3c103f894df0b0000667">The impact statements will be done once the final determination is made with respect to the sanctuary zones once they are determined, and—</text>
        <text id="20110308358d3c103f894df0b0000668">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="2748" />
        <text id="20110308358d3c103f894df0b0000669">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110308358d3c103f894df0b0000670">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA: </by> —of course, that is a requirement that we have committed to. It will be a requirement to do those impact statements. Quite simply, we are not going to do this until such time as there is a landing spot in regards to what the sanctuary zones are going to be. Otherwise, it is a nonsense—just like the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>