<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-02-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2641" />
  <endPage num="2711" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Forbes Primary School</name>
      <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000789">
        <heading>FORBES PRIMARY SCHOOL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-24">
            <name>FORBES PRIMARY SCHOOL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-24T15:07:00" />
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000790">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-24T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (15:07):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education. When and how was the Minister for Education first made aware that the Forbes Primary School was using water from a contaminated zone, and when did he inform the school?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Early Childhood Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Science and Information Economy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-24">
            <name>FORBES PRIMARY SCHOOL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-24T15:07:00" />
        <page num="2687" />
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000791">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-24T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Minister for Education, Minister for Early Childhood Development, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (15:07):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. The question presumes that the Forbes Primary School was in fact using water from a contaminated zone.</text>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000792">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000793">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  That is what you said in your question. If you want to have another question, rephrase it. I cannot help you if you cannot ask a question in the precise terms you really want to ask it.</text>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000794">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000795">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000796">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  The deputy leader has been a stickler for the standing orders. Can he stop interjecting? It is out of order.</text>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000797">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000798">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The minister will continue with no interjections from the other side.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000799">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  It is important that we give this information to the house, Madam Speaker, because it actually goes to the question of risk, and that is presumably what the community wants to know about. In relation to the particular bore in question at the Forbes Primary School, I am advised that it draws from a very deep level of the aquifer; something in the order of 35 to 45 metres. That, apparently, is not the level of the aquifer that is implicated in the potential contamination which is coming from the Hills Industries site.</text>
        <text id="201102240eb5388ce319456e90000800">Notwithstanding that, as soon as the EPA advised the education department—and I think that was on Monday of this week, but I will bring back to the house a precise answer. I became aware of this on Monday when cabinet was advised. I am not certain when the EPA took this step with the education department, but as soon as they took that step the school community was advised and they ceased using the bore until tests could be undertaken, although there was a very strong likelihood that this particular bore would not be implicated in this contamination. In any event they have taken the precaution, that testing is underway, and when we have those results we will then be able to act on the basis of those results.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>