<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-02-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2575" />
  <endPage num="2642" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000520">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-23">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-23T14:51:00" />
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000521">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-23T14:51:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (14:51): </by> My question is to the Minister for Health. Will the confidentiality clause, referred to by the Treasurer in an answer earlier, be included in contracts to be signed in the coming weeks and will they be sufficiently broad to prevent public scrutiny of any part of the contract for the operation and maintenance of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital?</text>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000522">The confidentiality clause that the South Australian Ombudsman has described as 'extremely broad' was included in the contract for the operation and maintenance of the Adelaide desalination plant. On 8 February 2011 the Ombudsman found 'there is a public interest in release of the contract', that is, the O&amp;M contract for the desal plant. He further stated that it was 'with some disquiet that I consider the agency is able to withhold the contract from disclosure'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-23">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-23T14:52:00" />
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000523">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-23T14:52:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:52): </by> It is extraordinary that the opposition would talk about confidentiality issues in relation to contracts. I seem to remember a water contract which was completely secret from the public of South Australia. I seem to recall the sale of ETSA—</text>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000524">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000525">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000526">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> —by the opposition.</text>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000527">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000528">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> Point of order, Madam Speaker.</text>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000529">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000530">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for MacKillop</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000531">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> The minister is debating the answer to the question. The question was quite straightforward.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000532">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes. I think that you need to get back to the question, minister. Are you responding to the question or have you finished your answer?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20110223b6e0a8c99b62495190000533">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> Well, Madam Speaker, I am happy to give some more information to the house. I was really trying to put the issue of confidentiality issues in contracts in context, and the context I was making was that there is a long history in this state of having confidentiality provisions within contracts. I will get some further advice for the member as to precisely what will happen, but can I say that it is the government's view that as much of the information as is practicable should be put in the public domain, because we think that this is a good deal for the taxpayers and they should understand how and why it is a good deal.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>